🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are watching intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". The policy could be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a law increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," stated one MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. An organization founded by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful online content contends that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading peer.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various individuals to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, further nations are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "might backfire". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and its followers indicate that states around the world are no longer content to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.